style(design): apply Minimal Dark Mode design system\n\n- Switched to complete Dark Mode (OLED-friendly)\n- Established standard color palette matching modern technical aesthetics\n- Changed font to Plus Jakarta Sans for increased legibility\n- Enforced dark mode as default in App.tsx\n- Fixed several React cascading render (setState in useEffect) warnings
This commit is contained in:
Gemini Nexus Bot committed
1 parent
b80531f8a8
commit
bac7b5591e
738 files changed
+138513
-138123
No files matched your search
+126
-126
@@ -1,126 +1,126 @@
|
||||
|
||||
# a:\UnityProjects\ManagerFork\AntigravityManager\cli\proto_utils.py
|
||||
import struct
|
||||
import base64
|
||||
|
||||
def encode_varint(value: int) -> bytes:
|
||||
if value < 0:
|
||||
raise ValueError("Varint encoding only supports non-negative integers. Use zigzag encoding for signed values.")
|
||||
|
||||
buf = []
|
||||
val = value
|
||||
while val >= 128:
|
||||
buf.append((val & 0x7F) | 0x80)
|
||||
val >>= 7
|
||||
buf.append(val)
|
||||
return bytes(buf)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_varint(data: bytes, offset: int) -> tuple[int, int]:
|
||||
result = 0
|
||||
shift = 0
|
||||
pos = offset
|
||||
length = len(data)
|
||||
|
||||
while pos < length:
|
||||
byte = data[pos]
|
||||
result |= (byte & 0x7F) << shift
|
||||
pos += 1
|
||||
if (byte & 0x80) == 0:
|
||||
return result, pos
|
||||
shift += 7
|
||||
raise ValueError("Incomplete varint data")
|
||||
|
||||
def create_string_field(field_num: int, value: str) -> bytes:
|
||||
tag = (field_num << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag_bytes = encode_varint(tag)
|
||||
value_bytes = value.encode('utf-8')
|
||||
len_bytes = encode_varint(len(value_bytes))
|
||||
return tag_bytes + len_bytes + value_bytes
|
||||
|
||||
def create_timestamp_field(field_num: int, seconds: int) -> bytes:
|
||||
# Timestamp message: Field 1 (seconds) as varint.
|
||||
# But usually Timestamp is int64, using varint here as per TS code logic.
|
||||
inner_tag = (1 << 3) | 0
|
||||
inner_tag_bytes = encode_varint(inner_tag)
|
||||
seconds_bytes = encode_varint(seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
inner_msg = inner_tag_bytes + seconds_bytes
|
||||
|
||||
tag = (field_num << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag_bytes = encode_varint(tag)
|
||||
len_bytes = encode_varint(len(inner_msg))
|
||||
|
||||
return tag_bytes + len_bytes + inner_msg
|
||||
|
||||
def create_oauth_info(access_token: str, refresh_token: str, expiry: int) -> bytes:
|
||||
# Field 1: Access Token (String)
|
||||
field1 = create_string_field(1, access_token)
|
||||
|
||||
# Field 2: Type ("Bearer")
|
||||
field2 = create_string_field(2, "Bearer")
|
||||
|
||||
# Field 3: Refresh Token (String)
|
||||
field3 = create_string_field(3, refresh_token)
|
||||
|
||||
# Field 4: Expiry (Timestamp wrapped in len delim)
|
||||
# The TS code creates a Timestamp message (field 1 -> seconds) wrapped as field 4 (len delim).
|
||||
field4 = create_timestamp_field(4, expiry)
|
||||
|
||||
return field1 + field2 + field3 + field4
|
||||
|
||||
def create_unified_oauth_token(access_token: str, refresh_token: str, expiry: int) -> str:
|
||||
oauth_info = create_oauth_info(access_token, refresh_token, expiry)
|
||||
# Base64 encode the OAuth token info
|
||||
oauth_info_b64 = base64.b64encode(oauth_info).decode('utf-8')
|
||||
|
||||
# Inner structure:
|
||||
# Field 1: string "oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey"
|
||||
# Field 2: string (base64 of oauth info) -> Wait, TS uses createStringField(1, oauthInfoB64) then createStringField(1, sentinel)??
|
||||
# Let's re-read TS carefully:
|
||||
# const inner1 = this.encodeStringField(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey'); -> Field 1
|
||||
# const inner2 = this.encodeStringField(1, oauthInfoB64); -> Actually createStringField(1, ...)
|
||||
# WAIT! The TS code has:
|
||||
# const inner2 = this.encodeStringField(1, oauthInfoB64);
|
||||
# const inner1 = this.encodeStringField(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey');
|
||||
# const innerField2 = this.encodeLenDelimField(2, inner2); -> This seems wrong in my reading or TS variable naming.
|
||||
# Ah, `inner2` is created as Field 1 string. Then it is wrapped in Field 2?
|
||||
# Let's look at `createUnifiedOAuthToken` in TS again.
|
||||
|
||||
# TS Logic:
|
||||
# 1. oauthInfo = createOAuthInfo(...)
|
||||
# 2. oauthInfoB64 = base64(oauthInfo)
|
||||
# 3. inner2 = encodeStringField(1, oauthInfoB64) -> This creates a Field 1 tag + len + string.
|
||||
# 4. inner1 = encodeStringField(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey') -> Field 1 tag + len + string.
|
||||
# 5. innerField2 = encodeLenDelimField(2, inner2) -> Wraps `inner2` (which is already a field) into a Field 2?
|
||||
# No, `encodeLenDelimField` takes `data` and wraps it. So `inner2` content becomes body of Field 2.
|
||||
# So Field 2 contains (Field 1: oauthInfoB64).
|
||||
# 6. inner = inner1 + innerField2
|
||||
# So `inner` is:
|
||||
# Field 1: "oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey"
|
||||
# Field 2: { Field 1: "base64..." }
|
||||
# 7. outer = encodeLenDelimField(1, inner)
|
||||
# So `outer` is:
|
||||
# Field 1: { ...inner... }
|
||||
# 8. Return base64(outer).
|
||||
|
||||
# My implementation:
|
||||
inner2_data = create_string_field(1, oauth_info_b64)
|
||||
# Wrap inner2_data in Field 2
|
||||
# encode_len_delim_field(2, inner2_data) logic:
|
||||
tag2 = (2 << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag2_bytes = encode_varint(tag2)
|
||||
len2_bytes = encode_varint(len(inner2_data))
|
||||
inner_field2 = tag2_bytes + len2_bytes + inner2_data
|
||||
|
||||
inner1 = create_string_field(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey')
|
||||
|
||||
inner = inner1 + inner_field2
|
||||
|
||||
# Wrap inner in Field 1
|
||||
tag1 = (1 << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag1_bytes = encode_varint(tag1)
|
||||
len1_bytes = encode_varint(len(inner))
|
||||
outer = tag1_bytes + len1_bytes + inner
|
||||
|
||||
return base64.b64encode(outer).decode('utf-8')
|
||||
|
||||
# a:\UnityProjects\ManagerFork\AntigravityManager\cli\proto_utils.py
|
||||
import struct
|
||||
import base64
|
||||
|
||||
def encode_varint(value: int) -> bytes:
|
||||
if value < 0:
|
||||
raise ValueError("Varint encoding only supports non-negative integers. Use zigzag encoding for signed values.")
|
||||
|
||||
buf = []
|
||||
val = value
|
||||
while val >= 128:
|
||||
buf.append((val & 0x7F) | 0x80)
|
||||
val >>= 7
|
||||
buf.append(val)
|
||||
return bytes(buf)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def read_varint(data: bytes, offset: int) -> tuple[int, int]:
|
||||
result = 0
|
||||
shift = 0
|
||||
pos = offset
|
||||
length = len(data)
|
||||
|
||||
while pos < length:
|
||||
byte = data[pos]
|
||||
result |= (byte & 0x7F) << shift
|
||||
pos += 1
|
||||
if (byte & 0x80) == 0:
|
||||
return result, pos
|
||||
shift += 7
|
||||
raise ValueError("Incomplete varint data")
|
||||
|
||||
def create_string_field(field_num: int, value: str) -> bytes:
|
||||
tag = (field_num << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag_bytes = encode_varint(tag)
|
||||
value_bytes = value.encode('utf-8')
|
||||
len_bytes = encode_varint(len(value_bytes))
|
||||
return tag_bytes + len_bytes + value_bytes
|
||||
|
||||
def create_timestamp_field(field_num: int, seconds: int) -> bytes:
|
||||
# Timestamp message: Field 1 (seconds) as varint.
|
||||
# But usually Timestamp is int64, using varint here as per TS code logic.
|
||||
inner_tag = (1 << 3) | 0
|
||||
inner_tag_bytes = encode_varint(inner_tag)
|
||||
seconds_bytes = encode_varint(seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
inner_msg = inner_tag_bytes + seconds_bytes
|
||||
|
||||
tag = (field_num << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag_bytes = encode_varint(tag)
|
||||
len_bytes = encode_varint(len(inner_msg))
|
||||
|
||||
return tag_bytes + len_bytes + inner_msg
|
||||
|
||||
def create_oauth_info(access_token: str, refresh_token: str, expiry: int) -> bytes:
|
||||
# Field 1: Access Token (String)
|
||||
field1 = create_string_field(1, access_token)
|
||||
|
||||
# Field 2: Type ("Bearer")
|
||||
field2 = create_string_field(2, "Bearer")
|
||||
|
||||
# Field 3: Refresh Token (String)
|
||||
field3 = create_string_field(3, refresh_token)
|
||||
|
||||
# Field 4: Expiry (Timestamp wrapped in len delim)
|
||||
# The TS code creates a Timestamp message (field 1 -> seconds) wrapped as field 4 (len delim).
|
||||
field4 = create_timestamp_field(4, expiry)
|
||||
|
||||
return field1 + field2 + field3 + field4
|
||||
|
||||
def create_unified_oauth_token(access_token: str, refresh_token: str, expiry: int) -> str:
|
||||
oauth_info = create_oauth_info(access_token, refresh_token, expiry)
|
||||
# Base64 encode the OAuth token info
|
||||
oauth_info_b64 = base64.b64encode(oauth_info).decode('utf-8')
|
||||
|
||||
# Inner structure:
|
||||
# Field 1: string "oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey"
|
||||
# Field 2: string (base64 of oauth info) -> Wait, TS uses createStringField(1, oauthInfoB64) then createStringField(1, sentinel)??
|
||||
# Let's re-read TS carefully:
|
||||
# const inner1 = this.encodeStringField(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey'); -> Field 1
|
||||
# const inner2 = this.encodeStringField(1, oauthInfoB64); -> Actually createStringField(1, ...)
|
||||
# WAIT! The TS code has:
|
||||
# const inner2 = this.encodeStringField(1, oauthInfoB64);
|
||||
# const inner1 = this.encodeStringField(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey');
|
||||
# const innerField2 = this.encodeLenDelimField(2, inner2); -> This seems wrong in my reading or TS variable naming.
|
||||
# Ah, `inner2` is created as Field 1 string. Then it is wrapped in Field 2?
|
||||
# Let's look at `createUnifiedOAuthToken` in TS again.
|
||||
|
||||
# TS Logic:
|
||||
# 1. oauthInfo = createOAuthInfo(...)
|
||||
# 2. oauthInfoB64 = base64(oauthInfo)
|
||||
# 3. inner2 = encodeStringField(1, oauthInfoB64) -> This creates a Field 1 tag + len + string.
|
||||
# 4. inner1 = encodeStringField(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey') -> Field 1 tag + len + string.
|
||||
# 5. innerField2 = encodeLenDelimField(2, inner2) -> Wraps `inner2` (which is already a field) into a Field 2?
|
||||
# No, `encodeLenDelimField` takes `data` and wraps it. So `inner2` content becomes body of Field 2.
|
||||
# So Field 2 contains (Field 1: oauthInfoB64).
|
||||
# 6. inner = inner1 + innerField2
|
||||
# So `inner` is:
|
||||
# Field 1: "oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey"
|
||||
# Field 2: { Field 1: "base64..." }
|
||||
# 7. outer = encodeLenDelimField(1, inner)
|
||||
# So `outer` is:
|
||||
# Field 1: { ...inner... }
|
||||
# 8. Return base64(outer).
|
||||
|
||||
# My implementation:
|
||||
inner2_data = create_string_field(1, oauth_info_b64)
|
||||
# Wrap inner2_data in Field 2
|
||||
# encode_len_delim_field(2, inner2_data) logic:
|
||||
tag2 = (2 << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag2_bytes = encode_varint(tag2)
|
||||
len2_bytes = encode_varint(len(inner2_data))
|
||||
inner_field2 = tag2_bytes + len2_bytes + inner2_data
|
||||
|
||||
inner1 = create_string_field(1, 'oauthTokenInfoSentinelKey')
|
||||
|
||||
inner = inner1 + inner_field2
|
||||
|
||||
# Wrap inner in Field 1
|
||||
tag1 = (1 << 3) | 2
|
||||
tag1_bytes = encode_varint(tag1)
|
||||
len1_bytes = encode_varint(len(inner))
|
||||
outer = tag1_bytes + len1_bytes + inner
|
||||
|
||||
return base64.b64encode(outer).decode('utf-8')
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user