[autoresearch] baseline: system prompt quality tests (5/5 passing)

This commit is contained in:
evandrodevbr committed 2026-04-11 05:27:36 -03:00
1 parent 05cc036f6d
commit 60b0101717
142 files changed
+18589 -9947

No files matched your search

+171
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
---
trigger: model_decision
description: >
When configuring Kubernetes deployments, GitOps infrastructure, or deployment
strategies (blue-green, canary, rolling). Load this file in addition to
ci-cd-principles.md when the tech stack uses Kubernetes or a managed container
platform with orchestration (GKE, EKS, AKS).
---
## CI/CD — GitOps and Kubernetes Deployment
> **Agent scope:** This is a supplement to `ci-cd-principles.md` (Level 2).
> Apply only when the project targets Kubernetes or a Kubernetes-based managed platform.
> Do not apply rolling/canary/blue-green patterns to Docker Compose or serverless deployments.
---
### Choosing a Deployment Strategy
| Strategy | When to use | Trade-off |
|----------|-------------|-----------|
| **Rolling** | Default for most services; SLO requirements | Simple, but mixes versions briefly |
| **Blue-Green** | Zero-downtime with instant rollback | Doubles infrastructure cost during switch |
| **Canary** | Risk-reducing incremental rollout; A/B variants | Requires traffic splitting capability |
---
### Rolling Deployment (Default)
Kubernetes native. Suitable for most stateless services.
```yaml
strategy:
type: RollingUpdate
rollingUpdate:
maxSurge: 25% # Max pods above desired count during update
maxUnavailable: 0% # Zero-downtime: don't remove pods before new ones ready
```
**Rules:**
- Set `maxUnavailable: 0` for production services with SLO requirements
- Set `minReadySeconds` to let pods stabilize before proceeding
- Configure `terminationGracePeriodSeconds` to finish in-flight requests before shutdown
---
### Blue-Green Deployment
**When:** Zero-downtime deployments where rollback must be instant and clean.
```
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Blue (v1) │ │ Green (v2) │
│ [LIVE 100%] │────→│ [STANDBY] │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
↕ Switch load balancer
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Blue (v1) │ │ Green (v2) │
│ [STANDBY] │ │ [LIVE 100%] │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
```
**Rules:**
- Both environments must be identical in infrastructure
- Run smoke tests against green before switching traffic
- Keep blue alive for at least 30 minutes post-switch (fast rollback window)
- Database migrations must be backward-compatible (blue still runs against the same DB)
---
### Canary Deployment
**When:** Risk-reducing incremental rollout; A/B testing deployment variants.
```
Traffic split during rollout:
5% → canary (v2)
95% → stable (v1)
↓ metrics look good
25% → canary
75% → stable
↓ bake time passes
100% → canary (now stable)
```
**Rules:**
- Define success metrics before starting rollout (error rate, latency SLO)
- Set automatic rollback threshold: if canary error rate > 2× baseline → auto-rollback
- Minimum bake time per traffic increment: 15–30 minutes
- Feature flags complement canary routing for functional (not just traffic) testing
---
### GitOps Pattern
For Kubernetes environments, use **declarative GitOps** instead of imperative `kubectl apply`.
**Pattern:**
```
Application Repo (code) → CI builds image → updates tag in Config Repo
Config Repo (K8s manifests) → ArgoCD/Flux syncs to cluster automatically
```
**Rules:**
- Git is the **single source of truth** for cluster state
- All changes to production go through PRs on the config repo — no direct `kubectl` in prod
- ArgoCD/Flux continuously reconciles — any manual drift is auto-corrected
- Secrets reference external secret stores — **never plaintext in git**
#### Example ArgoCD Application
```yaml
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Application
metadata:
name: myapp-production
spec:
source:
repoURL: https://github.com/org/config-repo
path: environments/production/myapp
targetRevision: HEAD
destination:
server: https://kubernetes.default.svc
namespace: production
syncPolicy:
automated:
prune: true # Remove resources deleted from git
selfHeal: true # Reconcile manual drift
```
---
### Secrets Management in Kubernetes
Never store plaintext secrets in git — even in private repositories.
| Tool | Pattern |
|------|---------|
| **External Secrets Operator** | Syncs secrets from AWS Secrets Manager, GCP Secret Manager, Vault into K8s Secrets |
| **Sealed Secrets** | Encrypts secrets with a cluster-held key; safe to commit encrypted form |
| **Vault Agent Injector** | Sidecars inject secrets directly into pods at runtime |
Choose based on your cloud provider or existing tooling. Document the choice in your
technical architecture document.
---
### Kubernetes CI/CD Checklist
- [ ] Deployment strategy defined and documented (rolling / blue-green / canary)?
- [ ] `maxUnavailable: 0` set for production services with SLO?
- [ ] `terminationGracePeriodSeconds` configured for graceful shutdown?
- [ ] GitOps in place — no direct `kubectl apply` commands in production CI pipeline?
- [ ] Config repo exists, separate from application repo?
- [ ] All PRs to config repo require review before ArgoCD/Flux sync?
- [ ] Secrets stored in external secret store, not plaintext in git?
- [ ] Rollback procedure tested and documented?
---
### Related Principles
- CI/CD Principles @ci-cd-principles.md (core pipeline — read first)
- Security Principles @security-principles.md (secrets management)
- Monitoring and Alerting Principles @monitoring-and-alerting-principles.md (canary success metrics)
- Feature Flags @feature-flags-principles.md (canary + feature flag interaction)